Back to Home

Agentic AI for ESG: Automating Supplier Data Validation & Reporting

How a mid-sized German automotive components manufacturer accelerated ESG compliance by validating Scope 3 supplier data with an Agentic AI validator.

Agentic AI ESG Validator

Client

Mid-sized automotive components manufacturer headquartered in Germany, supplying Tier-1/2 OEMs across the EU.

Context

With the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) ramping up, the client struggled to compile Scope 3 data from more than 300 suppliers. The ESG team spent weeks chasing files, normalizing formats, and fixing errors before every reporting cycle.

Challenge

  • Fragmented submissions (CSVs, PDFs, spreadsheets) and inconsistent units.
  • Manual checks for data quality (coverage %, units, ranges).
  • Methodology text (“estimated”, “assumed”) hard to assess at scale.
  • Tight deadlines; high audit rework risk.

Objectives

  • Accelerate supplier data validation and consolidation.
  • Reduce audit risk via clear, traceable issues & fixes.
  • Free ESG analysts’ time for actual analysis, not chasing and formatting.

Solution Overview — Agentic AI Validator

We designed an Agentic AI system to decide and act: run deterministic checks, interpret methodology text, and draft precise correction emails — without hand-coding every branch.

  • Rule-based validation: required fields, numeric ranges, unit = “kgCO2e”, coverage ≤ 100%.
  • LLM-assisted review: reads methodology text, flags vague terms, drafts correction emails.
  • Next-action policy: accept valid data, else request targeted corrections with deadlines.

Implementation Snapshots

  • Week 1: Lightweight prototype, rule schema, LLM prompts.
  • Week 2: Policy orchestration + email drafting, 15 core test runs.
  • Week 3: AWS landing zone (CDK bootstrap), stack design (S3 → Lambda → DynamoDB).

Business Impact

  • 60–75% faster validation turnaround for first batch of suppliers.
  • Over 40% fewer audit corrections, thanks to unit/range checks.
  • Analysts freed to focus on variance analysis and supplier coaching.

Sample Metrics (first 30 days)

  • Supplier on-time submissions ↑ +32%
  • Validation pass-rate on first attempt ↑ +28%
  • Avg. time per file ↓ −55%
  • Top causes flagged: unit mismatch, coverage > 100%, vague methodology.

Client Quote

“The agent’s emails were spot-on. Our suppliers finally knew exactly what to fix, and our team could focus on trends and material risks.”

Call to Action

Ready to validate supplier data at scale — without the manual grind?